Japanese Quality by Jaw

Why Do Tolerances Exist? — Interchangeability, Deviation, and the Logic of MMC & LMC

Starting with "what are tolerances actually for?" — this article covers the JIS 2016 terminology revision, the critical difference between deviation and tolerance, and the logic behind Maximum and Least Material Condition. A foundation-builder before diving into geometric tolerancing proper.

01

The Purpose of Tolerances

A question that trips up even veterans

"What are tolerances for?" — asked suddenly, even experienced engineers sometimes hesitate. The simple answer:

To give machines interchangeability while ensuring they fulfill their intended function.

Interchangeability means parts can be swapped between assemblies. Function means the resulting fit provides the intended clearance, interference, or freedom of movement — within specified limits. Tolerances exist to achieve both simultaneously.

The English word tolerance originally meant something like "allowance for imperfection." Because perfectly identical replication is impossible, we allow a defined amount of deviation — that allowance is the tolerance.

02

A Brief History — The Factory Manager Who Nearly Got Killed

Interchangeability was once a radical idea

The concept of interchangeability is historically recent. In the 18th century, when rifle and lock parts were hand-filed by craftsmen, it was normal practice to fit each component individually to its mating part. One part was made to fit this specific counterpart — and no other.

The result could be highly functional, but the parts were not interchangeable. Swap a component from one assembly into another and the fit might be too loose, or too tight to assemble at all.

How radical the idea was

When interchangeability was first introduced into manufacturing, it was met with such fierce resistance from craftsmen that — according to historical accounts — the factory manager who attempted to impose it came close to being killed by the workforce. The idea that a part could be made to a specification rather than fitted to a specific counterpart was, at the time, incomprehensible. Custom fitting was simply how manufacturing worked.

Machine tool technology has since made interchangeability an unquestioned baseline. But even today, perfect replication remains impossible — which is precisely why tolerances are still needed.

03

JIS 2016 Revision — "Dimension" Becomes "Size"

Why the same number now has a different name

The 2016 JIS revision reorganized terminology substantially. The headline change: many uses of the word "dimension" were replaced by "size."

"Dimension" was not eliminated — it still covers quantities like step heights, radii, and straight-line distances. "Size" is now the specific term for distance-like quantities associated with particular geometrical forms (circles, parallel planes, etc.).

The most visible change: the reference value in a tolerance specification.

In a callout like 50 +0/−0.5, the number "50" has been called many things across companies and eras:

Term Status Notes
Basic Dimension Common in US CAD software Translation of "Basic Dimension" — also used for boxed dimensions in GD&T (theoretically exact values)
Reference Dimension Non-standard Internal convention in some companies
Nominal Dimension JIS 1998 (previous standard) The formally correct term under the old standard
Nominal Size (読み: Nomi) Non-standard Informal reading of "Nominal Dimension"
Nominal Size (呼びサイズ) JIS 2016 — current standard From "Nominal" = "in name only." The officially correct current term.

The 2016 revision also split what was previously called the "tolerance zone" into two distinct concepts:

New term Meaning
Size tolerance interval The interval from the lower limit of size to the upper limit of size (a range concept)
Tolerance zone Continues to be used in its original sense within geometric tolerancing
04

Tolerance Quiz

A classic question that reveals a common confusion
A drawing specifies 30 ±0.05. What is the tolerance?
The entire specification 30 ±0.05
Both limit values written out (29.95 and 30.05)
0.05 (half of the tolerance)
±0.05 — close, but this is the deviation, not the tolerance
0.1 — the difference between upper and lower deviation ✓

Most people instinctively choose ④. But ±0.05 is the deviation (upper deviation = +0.05, lower deviation = −0.05). The tolerance is the difference between those two deviations: (+0.05) − (−0.05) = 0.1.

A common floor mistake

"What's the tolerance on this feature?" — "Plus or minus point-oh-five." Technically, ±0.05 is the deviation; the tolerance is 0.1. In everyday shop conversation this distinction is often blurred, but in formal documentation and geometric tolerancing, it matters.

05

Deviation, Tolerance, and Size Difference — Illustrated

Three related but distinct concepts

Fig. 01 — Nominal size, deviation, tolerance, and size difference (shaft example)

Nominal size Upper limit of size Lower limit of size Actual size (measured) Upper dev. T Tolerance Tolerance = upper deviation − lower deviation Deviation = signed distance from nominal to a limit Size difference = actual size − nominal size (varies with each measurement)

For 30 ±0.05: upper deviation = +0.05, lower deviation = −0.05, tolerance = 0.10. The size difference (deviation of the actual measured value from nominal) changes with every measurement.

Term
Deviation
Signed distance from the nominal size to the upper or lower limit. Has a sign (+ or −).
Has sign: ±
Example: +0.05 / −0.05
Term
Tolerance
The difference between upper and lower deviation. The total "allowance." Has no sign.
No sign
Example: 0.10
Term
Size Difference
Actual measured value minus nominal size. Changes with each part measured. Has a sign.
Has sign: ±
Changes per measurement

The English view

In English, both "deviation" (a limit distance) and "size difference" (a measured offset) are called deviation. Upper Limit Deviation, Lower Limit Deviation, and the deviation of an actual measured value are all "deviation" in ISO/ASME terminology. This shared word reflects a genuine conceptual connection that can get lost in translation.

06

Recent Changes in Drawing Practice

What the JIS revision changed on the drawing itself
Item Previous practice Current (JIS 2013–2016 onward)
Diameter symbol (φ) Required on all features whose cross-section exceeds a semicircle May be omitted when the feature is clearly circular in the view. Required on leader-line callouts.
How to read φ "Pi" (パイ) — still common among veterans "Phi" (ファイ) — the JIS-specified pronunciation
Tolerance notation Upper/lower values stacked in half-height text Same height, stacked two lines; single-line slash notation permitted to save space
Arrow terminator Open 30° arrowhead (outline only) Filled 30° arrowhead — now the global trend; better visibility

3D CAD and tolerance notation

As 3D models increasingly define geometry, one-sided tolerance notation (e.g. +0.05/0) has become less common. Symmetric ±0.05 notation and geometric tolerance callouts are now the mainstream — aligning with model-based definition workflows.

07

MMC and LMC

Remember them by fit tightness, not by size

MMC and LMC appear frequently in geometric tolerancing discussions. The word "material" (as in Maximum Material) comes directly from the English — it means physical material, as in the metal of the part.

MMC Maximum Material Condition
ShaftLargest (most material)
HoleSmallest (most material)
→ Tightest fit between mating parts
LMC Least Material Condition
ShaftSmallest (least material)
HoleLargest (least material)
→ Loosest fit between mating parts

Fig. 02 — MMC and LMC: shaft and hole comparison

MMC Shaft large / Hole small Tight fit clearance LMC Shaft small / Hole large Loose fit

MMC = tightest fit. LMC = loosest fit. The shaft is obvious; for the hole, remember that a larger hole means less material, so Least Material Condition = largest hole.

Why the hole seems "backwards"

A larger hole means more material has been removed — so a bigger hole = less remaining material = LMC. This is the counter-intuitive part. The cleanest way to remember it: MMC = tight fit, LMC = loose fit. Work from the fit, not from the size.

08

Summary — Warm-Up Complete

Four foundations before geometric tolerancing
Point 01
The purpose of tolerances

Interchangeability + function. Perfect replication is impossible, so tolerances define the acceptable range of imperfection.

Point 02
Tolerance ≠ deviation

±0.05 is deviation. Tolerance is the difference between upper and lower deviation: 0.10. Commonly confused — even on the shop floor.

Point 03
JIS 2016 changes

"Nominal Dimension" → "Nominal Size" is the key terminology update. The JIS B 0401 old/new comparison table is the reference for mapping old terms to new ones.

Point 04
MMC and LMC

Remember by fit tightness: MMC = tightest, LMC = loosest. For holes, larger = less material, so LMC = largest hole.

This article is the warm-up before geometric tolerancing. With the terminology and conceptual foundations in place, each geometric tolerance symbol becomes significantly easier to understand. Next: a closer look at size itself.

⚙️

Jaw

Based in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. 36 years in quality management and precision measurement at an automotive parts manufacturer — specializing in CMM measurement and surface roughness measurement of cylinder blocks and crankshafts. Currently supporting the floor as a manager and mentoring the next generation. This blog shares practical measurement and quality knowledge from real manufacturing experience.

← Back to Articles